Tuesday, November 21, 2017

North Dakota State Cross Country 2017- An Analysis of the Boy's Race

(*It might be easier to view some of the data here if you turn your phone sideways or read on a computer*)

State cross country this year was in Valley City, ND on a stunningly beautiful late fall day. The temperature in the morning was a balmy 15 degrees, working it's way up into the low 40s during the day. The sun was shining and the wind was negligent. The course was pretty flat with relatively few tight turns. The ground was dry and the grass manicured. Basically, perfect conditions for fast cross country. Through a strange happenstance that I have never understood, the meet was delayed due to the thick morning frost.

Now, I've experienced meets pushed back due to frost before (in college specifically), but I've never understood it. I heard word that the golf course manager was worried about the facility and pushed for the meet to start later. In 2009 I raced on this course for State XC and it was raining and dreary most of the day. By the time the Class B Boys raced (the last of the 4 races), the course was a mudpit. Times were slow and people were slipping everywhere. I fail to see how racing on a frost-covered course can do more damage than running in mud, but maybe I just don't understand how things work.

Either way, there were some exciting races taking place throughout the day. Whether it was the individual race in the B Boys or the team race in the A girls, the great conditions did not disappoint. A little overview of the champions:

Class A Boys:
Individual Champion: Evan Sayler, Senior, Bismarck Century, 15:42 (won by 22 seconds)
Team Champion: Bismarck Century, 60 points (4 ahead of 2nd place Williston)

Class B Boys:
Individual Champion: Jaiven Hale, Junior, New Town, 16:02 (won by 16 seconds)
Team Champion: New Town, 29 points (93 points ahead of 2nd place Hillsboro/Central Valley)

Class A Girls:
Individual Champion: Kelby Rinas, Sophomore, Mandan, 18:15 (won by 10 seconds)
Team Champion: Fargo Davies, 88 points (won in a tie-break with Grand Forks Central, and 1 point ahead of 3rd place Bismarck Century)

Class B Girls:
Individual Champion: Reagan Baesler, Hillsboro/Central Valley, 18:27 (won by 32 seconds)
Team Champion: Hillsboro/Central Valley, 96 points (12 ahead of 2nd place Watford City)
------------------------------------------
The 2016 analysis can be found here: 2016 Boys
Let's take a look at each race:

Class B Boys:
The question in this race was not, 'Who would win the State Title', but rather, 'How low of a score could New Town get while winning their sixth State Title in a row?' New Town was noticeably weaker this year, having five runners ranked in the top ten but not necessarily the top five or six. The race played out a as expected- A glob of yellow jerseys to the front at the start along with the black jersey of Isaac Huber (Edgeley/Kulm), determined to break the hold of Eagle dominance at the top. Predictably, Jalen Chase moved to the front and gapped the field in the first mile. The recent state-record holder in the B 3200m on the track, this was no surprise to anybody. However, by the first mile and beyond, last year's state champion in cross country faded back and allowed teammates and Huber to pass in front of him. He ended up finishing fourth.

The race rapidly turned into a two-man battle for the title- Huber and Jaiven Hale. Huber patiently waited and picked off yellow jerseys one-by-one until it was just the two juniors left. Huber sat behind Hale for the majority of the second and third miles. With about a half mile left to go, Huber moved up on the shoulder of Hale and they were side by side. It was exciting! Almost as soon as that happened though, Hale turned on the jets and pushed a huge gap on Huber in a very short amount of time. As Hale sprinted away to victory, Huber was left gassed and was passed by Robert White (sophomore/New Town) and almost passed by Jalen Chase. New Town ended up going 1-2-4-7-15 for a total of 29. Normally that would be obliteration (it was), but in previous years they've taken 6 of the top 7 spots- a noticeable difference.

Congrats to New Town, though! 

As for the rest of the race, there were 45 teams and 293 runners. That's by far that largest of any of the four state races, but the depth was still more in the boy's race. In the analysis of the girls race (here), I noted that the difference between 1st and 100th place was close to 5 minutes, but here it was less than 4. It's interesting to see that even with more athletes, the finishing places over the exact same distance were closer.


2004- 157 runners, 27 teams
2005- 149 runners, 27 teams
2006- 180 runners, 30 teams
2007- 183 runners, 31 teams
2008- 188 runners, 32 teams
2009- 176 runners, 34 teams
2010- 185 runners, 35 teams
2011- 171 runners, 36 teams
2012- 191 runners, 36 teams
2013- 207 runners, 35 teams
2014- 221 runners, 40 teams
2015- 247 runners, 45 teams
2016- 265 runners, 49 teams
2017- 293 runners, 45 teams

*Note that in the chart above, 1 on the x-axis corresponds to 2004, and 14 corresponds to 2017.
This chart makes it clear that since 2011, the number of athletes in this race has steadily increased every year. This is leading to discussions of what to do with increasing numbers (a more in-depth discussion can be found on the girl's analysis). Basically, this growth at the state meet is unsustainable. At this pace, we can expect 350 runners by roughly 2023, not too far away. Very, very few courses in the state can support numbers like that. So, a solution needs to be found.

Next we'll look at the state meet predictions for next year. The methodology is simple: remove all the seniors from the state race and re-score it. This will give you a general idea of team depth beyond what are normally the fastest runners on each team (seniors). Of course, this can't account for those runners that had off races, and it can't account for massive improvements from year-year by younger athletes. Here's what last year's predictions looked like versus what actually happened this year:

2017 Predictions                                  2017 Actual
1.) New Town (21)                                 1.) New Town (29)
2.) Rugby (109)                                      2.) Hillsboro/CV (123)
3.) Beulah/Hazen (153)                          3.) Hatton/Thompson/Northwood (159)
4.) Hillsboro/Central Valley (157)         4.) Rubgy (174)
5.) Bowman County (213)                     5.) Bowman County (211)

It looks like New Town and Bowman County followed in last year's footsteps almost exactly, but overall the top five was different. H/N/T snuck into the top five. Rugby and Beulah/Hazen both were lower, and Hillsboro/CV was higher, even though the overall score wasn't much different. Before re-scoring this year's meet: here's a brief overview of grades of all the athletes in the top 40:
Seniors- 7
Juniors- 11
Sophomores- 12
Freshmen- 8
8th Grade- 2
7th Grade- 0

Compared to last year, the state is very heavy in the middle-high school range, but rather low on seniors at the top. This suggests a pretty strong Class B for at least the next two years. In fact, there were only two seniors in the top ten, and none in the top three.

Here's what next year's state meet would look like if we take out all seniors and re-score the meet:
2017 Actual:                       2018 Predictions:
1.) New Town (29)               1.) New Town (67)
2.) Hillsboro/CV (123)         2.) H/CV          (122)
3.) H/N/T         (159)            3.) Rugby        (137)
4.) Rugby        (174)             4.) Bowman Co. (204)
5.) Bowman Co. (211)          5.) Carrington     (307)

A few things to take note of in this year's results that show on next year's predictions:

1.) The reason why the scores seem to be higher overall is because there are 25 teams represented in the first 50 places at state (after seniors removed). The fact that most teams had their second runner coming in around places 40-60 is really going to drive scores up.

2.) There were about 6 teams all having their runners 1-5 finish in the same general area, and this created a massive log jam immediately after the top five. See for yourself:
6th: H/N/T (341)
7th: Beulah/Hazen (349)
8th: Griggs Co. Central (352)
9th: Pembina Co. North (357)
10th: Four Winds/Minnewauken (378)
What this says is simple: I'm not gonna give any athletes or coaches training advice, but all you need is your 4-5 runners putting in a tough summer of work and dropping a decent chunk of time on their 5k, moving up 30-40 places in the middle of the pack, and suddenly you have a top five team. 3-5 runners are what carry teams at big meets like state, and having a low stick helps, but not as much.

3.) New Town. Not only would 67 points be their highest total in many years, but what's more important is that their fifth runner comes in at 38th place. Their 6th runner comes in at 141st place. Additionally, Hillsboro's fifth runner comes in at 43rd place, but their 6th runner is 159th. That doesn't bode well for next year or the future, because one injury in the top five and suddenly you drop a few places. For perspective, Rugby's 8th runner was 108th place. That's huge for long-term development.

Class A Boys
The Class A Boys race was the Bismarck Century show. Senior Evan Sayler ran 15:42 to win by more than 20 seconds, while as a team they won the title with 60 points. The team race wasn't as big of a victory as the individual race, however, as Williston was right behind them with a score of 64 points. It was also BC's second consecutive state championship.

I'm not going to spend much time talking about teams and numbers in the Class A race, because for many years the number of teams and runners hasn't changed all that much. In my senior year of high school (2010), there were 160 athletes and 18 teams. This year there was 175 athletes and 19 teams. The main reason for this is that the Class A schools have stayed constant, and most of them bring the full 10-person roster every year. I mean, this year the teams averaged 9.2 runners/team, and only a few teams didn't meet the 10-person threshold. So, numbers aren't much of a worry in Class A.

Now for some analysis of the actual race. First off, let's look at how well-matched the top two teams, Bismarck Century and Williston, were in the results. Like I did in the article for the girls, I'm going to compare the place finishes of each team's top 6 runners to show how close four points actually is at a big meet. The last row will be the total time (in seconds) difference between the BC and Williston runners.
                                           1st             2nd           3rd          4th          5th           6th
Bismarck Century               1                5               11           13           30           (34)
Williston                             4                7               14           18           21           (35)
Time Difference                 33 sec        2 sec          6 sec      9 sec      -11 sec      1 sec
As you can see, these two teams were very close at almost every position. Williston lost points at runners 1, 2, 3 and 4, but made up 9 points on the 5th runner. Basically, Williston's 2, 3 and 4 runners could have each run 5-10 seconds faster and the state champion would have been different. Like I've said, those middle runners make all the difference in big meets.

Here's the grade levels of the top 40 in the men's A race:
Seniors- 13
Juniors- 10
Sophomores- 8
Freshmen- 7
8th Grade- 1
7th Grade- 1

As opposed to other races we have seen this year, this one was very top-heavy. Usually boy's races have more upperclassmen at the top compared to girl's, and certainly next year's list will look similar. Also, if anybody can tell me how Williston always has fast 7th and 8th graders at state, I'd love to know.

Now for the predictions. Here's how last year's predictions panned out this year:
2017 Predictions                               2017 Actual
1.) Bismarck Century (52)                1.) Bismarck Century (60)
2.) Bismarck Legacy (87)                 2.) Williston  (64)
3.) Bismarck High  (113)                  3.) Bismarck Legacy (85)
4.) Grand Forks Red River (161)     4.) Bismarck High  (126)
5.) Fargo Davies  (166)                    5.) Fargo North (177)

Here we can see that the predicted top three teams all were fairly close to their predicted point totals. However, Williston moved up a lot, and Fargo North snuck into the top five. It's also worth noting that the top 4 teams this year were all from the west half of the state.

Here's next year's predictions when seniors are removed and the meet is re-scored.
2017 Actual                                    2018 Predictions
1.) Bismarck Century (60)              1.) Williston (46)
2.) Williston  (64)                           2.) Bismarck Legacy (75)
3.) Bismarck Legacy (85)               3.) Bismarck Century (93)
4.) Bismarck High (126)                4.) Fargo North (126)
5.) Fargo North (177)                     5.) Bismarck High (182)
                                                        6.) Fargo Davies (189)

Two short notes on this:
1.) Last year in predictions, I took out all seniors and juniors, and then only scored 4 runners. Williston had 36 points, and the next closest was 72. We are likely about to see a few years of orange dominance. Not only is Williston predicted to win handily next year, but they are YOUNG. In the re-scored list for next year (2018), Williston has 7 runners in before every other team in the state- besides Bismarck Legacy- has 5. Here's the current (2017) grades of those top seven next year:
-Sophomore
-Freshman
-Sophomore
-7th Grade
-Junior
-Sophomore
-Sophomore(this 7th runner is predicted at 26th place next year)
So, basically we can see them easily winning state at least the next two year. Somehow this town puts together a strong team every single year.

2.) WDA dominance will likely continue with 4 teams in the top 6 next year.

Last, but certainly not least, the list of how strong each division is. The next list is showing the average of the top ten times in each division each year, followed by the percent difference. This shows the relative strength of each division each year.

Year      Class A     Class B   % Difference
2017     16:16.8    16:36.7        2.0%
2016     16:03.6    16:27.4        2.5%
2015     16:15.8    16:58.0        4.3%
2014     16:15.1    16:53.0        3.9%
2013     16:16.7    17:05.7        5.0%
2012     16:07.8    17:19.4        7.4%
2011     15:59.0    17:13.3        7.7%
2010     16:52.1    17:34.4        4.2%
2009     16:12.1    17:06.3        5.6%
2008     16:39.9    17:19.5        4.0%
2007     16:10.6    16:38.7        2.9%
2006     16:29.5    17:09.1        4.0%
2005     17:06.5    17:23.6        1.7%
2004     16:53.0    17:49.5        5.6% 
2003     16:19.0    17:10.0        5.2% (overall avg. 4.4%)

Based on the data, it seems as if Class B as a whole is getting stronger over the last few years, but one must take into account that years 2010-2013 were the Jake Leingang/Bismarck obliteration years that are certainly outliers. I must say, though, that only a 20 second average difference between the two divisions says a lot about the strength of the top Class B runners right now. Don't sleep on them, college coaches!

Tuesday, November 7, 2017

North Dakota State Cross Country 2017- An Analysis of the Women's Race


 

(*It might be easier to view some of the data here if you flip your phone sideways or use a computer*)

State cross country this year was in Valley City, ND on a stunningly beautiful late fall day. The temperature in the morning was a balmy 15 degrees, working it's way up into the low 40s during the day. The sun was shining and the wind was negligent. The course was pretty flat with relatively few tight turns. The ground was dry and the grass manicured. Basically, perfect conditions for fast cross country. Through a strange happenstance that I have never understood, the meet was delayed due to the thick morning frost.

Now, I've experienced meets pushed back due to frost before (in college specifically), but I've never understood it. I heard word that the golf course manager was worried about the facility and pushed for the meet to start later. In 2009 I raced on this course for State XC and it was raining and dreary most of the day. By the time the Class B Boys raced (the last of the 4 races), the course was a mudpit. Times were slow and people were slipping everywhere. I fail to see how racing on a frost-covered course can do more damage than running in mud, but maybe I just don't understand how things work.

Either way, there were some exciting races taking place throughout the day. Whether it was the individual race in the B Boys or the team race in the A girls, the great conditions did not disappoint. A little overview of the champions:

Class A Boys:
Individual Champion: Evan Sayler, Senior, Bismarck Century, 15:42 (won by 22 seconds)
Team Champion: Bismarck Century, 60 points (4 ahead of 2nd place Williston)

Class B Boys:
Individual Champion: Jaiven Hale, Junior, New Town, 16:02 (won by 16 seconds)
Team Champion: New Town, 29 points (93 points ahead of 2nd place Hillsboro/Central Valley)

Class A Girls:
Individual Champion: Kelby Rinas, Sophomore, Mandan, 18:15 (won by 10 seconds)
Team Champion: Fargo Davies, 88 points (won in a tie-break with Grand Forks Central, and 1 point ahead of 3rd place Bismarck Century)

Class B Girls:
Individual Champion: Reagan Baesler, Hillsboro/Central Valley, 18:27 (won by 32 seconds)
Team Champion: Hillsboro/Central Valley, 96 points (12 ahead of 2nd place Watford City)
 -------------------------------------------------------------
Last year's analysis can be found here: 2016 Analysis
I'll take a brief look at each race individually now.

Class B Girls:
The big story of this race was the dominating performance of Reagan Baesler. This was her second state championship in a row (it's worth noting that Kayla Ogle was 2nd for the 2nd year in a row) and this was by more than 30 seconds. It was clear during the race that she had this locked up. She was near the front immediately after the start, moved into the front, and started growing the gap throughout the race. Even within the third mile she looked better than most girls quite a ways behind her. Her team, Hillsboro/Central Valley won their 7th consecutive state title, an impressive feat to be sure.

This year there were 260 athletes competing for 46 different teams. Last year there were 223 athletes from 47 teams. However some schools added co-ops, so that may explain how the participation numbers go up while team numbers go down.

Year   Runners      Teams
2004 144 25
2005 146 27
2006 153 28
2007 150 29
2008 179 30
2009 177 35
2010 172 41
2011 198 38
2012 196 37
2013 209 37
2014 208 39
2015 234 45
2016 223 47
2017 260 46
*Note that on this chart, "1" stands for 2004, and the years increase by 1. 
As you can see from the chart, the number of athletes has been exploding in recent years. This comes as no surprise, being that cross country is the best sport out there, but in reality Class B is facing some tough decisions coming up. I wasn't at the coaches meeting this year, but I did hear that high participation numbers again came up as a problems. Simply put, there are few courses in the state that can accommodate 260 runners. Many B schools host their meets on 9-hole golf courses or area parks, and many A schools do much the same, with perhaps an 18-hole golf course. None of these places are set up to handle that kind of load. North Dakota is unique in that the state meet bounces location from year to year and that every school, no matter what division, can bring 10 runners to compete at the state meet. In most states, this would be disastrous because there would be more than 500 kids on the start line for each race, but we don't have enough people to worry about that.

Until now. The solutions being presented each have downs and ups. Here's an example of a few:
1.) Make a permanent site for state cross country. This appeals to Jamestown specifically because they want it every year and have a decently wide course. It would add stability to the schedule and provide quite a boost to the local economy. However, having different locations every year is a lot of fun and the Jamestown course isn't all that great for spectators and coaches. At state last year we were instructed that we could not go back into the woods that the kids run through, which is also where mile marker 1 is located. As a coach, I did not like the course. As a spectator, I wouldn't either. As a state high school activities association, I would love it.
2.) Limit state meet entries. Minnesota limits to 7 varsity runners at most meets, especially districts, sections, and state. B schools like Watford City, Rugby, Beulah/Hazen would be limited in how many athletes they could have competing. A quick check of this year shows that 31 girls would not have competed, bringing participation down to 229. As numbers keep rising and the number of teams with between 3-7 runners increases, I don't think this is a good long-term strategy.
3.) 2 start lines at the state meet. Yes, this was actually a suggestion. I won't even write about it because it's comical to have something like this at a STATE MEET.

Me personally, I think a good short-term strategy would be move some of the bigger B schools up to A, which should even things out, and long term look at going towards a 3-class system in most of the sports in the state.

Last thing about this issue: 100th place in the B girls race was almost 5 MINUTES behind the leader. The absurdity of that means that the race is strung out quite a bit, and as long as the first half/full mile of the course is wide, the girls race has room to race on many different courses.


Now we'll look at a hypothetical state meet next year. Last year I took all the seniors out of the state meet and re-scored it. Here's how it compared with what actually happened this year:

Predicted                           Actual
H/CV   103                       H/CV 96
Rubgy 118                        Watford City 108
Bowman County 196        Rugby 148
So. Mclean 262                 New Town 261
Watford City 273              H/N/T 286

So, the teams were a little off, but the scores were pretty close. Moral of the story right now: score under 100 points if you want to win, under 200 points to podium, and under 300 for a shot at top 5.
Here's a breakdown of the top 40 by grade of this year's B girls race:
Seniors- 4
Juniors- 9
Sophomores- 9
Freshmen- 8
8th Grade- 5
7th Grade- 5
This mirrors last year almost exactly.
Here's how the scoring would be affected by removing the seniors from the overall results:

2017:                       2018 (predicted):
H/CV 96                 Watford 115*
Watford 108           H/CV    135
Rugby 148            Rugby    166
New Town 261       New Town 230
H/N/T 286             H/N/T 253

What can we take from this? Well, first off the top five probably isn't going to change much. On next year's predictions, the sixth place team would be Stanley, just about 80 points back of 5th place. Second thing to note is that Watford City has low sticks. In running lingo, this means they have girls up front getting some low scores. In fact, Watford's first 4 girls come in with a score of 35 points. Their fifth runner is positioned at 60th, and their 6th at 62. If their girls up front can stay there, and their 5/6 runners move up, they will win next year, ending Hillsboro/Central Valley's reign atop the State B Girls.

*I've heard the Watford City is going Class A next year, and if that's true, then it'll be Hillsboro/Central Valley and Rugby battling for top honors.

Class A Girls:
The big story in this race was the incredibly close team finish.There were 3 teams within one point of the state championship. Fargo Davies and Grand Forks Central tied with 88 points, while Bismarck Century was one point back with 89 points. Davies won the tiebreaker because officials look at whichever team had their 6th runner come in 1st. It's also worth noting that Bismarck High was 4th with 99 points, putting 4 teams within 11 points of the championship. I mean, 11 points is every girl on your team moving up or down 2 or 3 positions in a race with hundreds of runners. It doesn't get much closer than that! Let's look at how each team fared with their top five (also included is each team's 1-5 spread, which is the difference in times between their 1st runner and 5th. Strong teams at big meets usually have small spreads):
                         1st              2nd         3rd          4th          5th         (6th)         1-5 Spread
Davies               11               12           18           21           26          (28)           0:57
GFC                   6                 8             9            23           42          (45)           1:40
BC                     4                 5             17          19            34         (68)           1:34
BHS                  2                 15           19           27           36          (38)           1:47

It's worth noting that the 1-7 spread for Davies was actually 1:10, still less than any other team's 1-5.
Looking at this chart, it becomes clear why Davies and Central were so close, but Davies won. GFC had low sticks, with three girls in the top ten. However, their 5 runner didn't come in until 42nd place. Davies, on the other hand, had no girls in the top 10, but had a tight-knit group of girls taking away spots from the other teams. They also won the tiebreak because of having more depth in the 6th and 7th positions. This isn't to suggest that Davies dominated, however, because one girl losing one spot would have given the championship to GFC. It was that close!

I won't take the time to look at participation numbers for Girl's Class A, because even though the total runners jumped about 10 from last year (176 this year), Class A teams usually bring 10 runners to state, and the number of Class A teams hasn't changed much. To get a more accurate picture, one would have to look at something like a conference meet where everybody runs in some sort of race.

Let's analyze the race. Here's a breakdown of the top 40 by grade:
Seniors- 5
Juniors- 5
Sophomores- 11
Freshmen- 10
8th Grade- 7
7th Grade- 2

Just like the Class B race, a very young top 40, but again this mirrors pretty close to last year as well.
Here now is my prediction last year (based upon taking out seniors and re-scoring the meet) versus what actually happened.
 Predicted:                 Actual:
1.) Davies 54           Davies 88
2.) BHS 94              GFC   88 
3.) BC 116               BC    89
4.) GFC 139            BHS  99
5.) Minot 152          Minot 149

As you can see, the results again line up pretty well, especially with Minot, Davies, and Bismarck Century. Here now is what the results look like for next year, minus the seniors:
2017:                             2018 (predicted):
Davies 88                    Davies 80
GFC    88                    BC       82
BC     89                     BHS     90
BHS    99                   GFC      113
Minot 149                  Minot    149

Note that the predicted 6th place team is West Fargo with 189 points. What do we make of this? Well, it looks like the top 5 will jostle around a little, but fundamentally not change. The WDA will still be completely dominant, and Davies will have another close title run.

The last thing I want to look at is the difference in the average of the top ten times in each race at state. Naturally, the A Girls are usually faster in the top ten, but by how much? Here's the chart (note that this is only year 2 of 5k race distances, before that they were 4k): 

Year        Class A             Class B             % Difference
2017       18:37.8              19:15.4                 3.4%
2016       18:14.8              19:10.4                 5.1%
2015       14:42.2              15:04.6                 2.5%
2014       14:37.7              15:26.8                 5.6%
2013       14:48.7              15:30.3                 4.7%
2012       15:11.7              15:54.9                 4.7%
2011       14:39.8              15:25.9                 5.2%
2010       15:12.6              15:50.7                 4.2%
2009       15:06.0              15:41.3                 3.9%
2008       15:16.1              16:06.3                 5.5%
2007       14:57.1              15:32.3                 3.9%
2006       14:59.4              15:42.8                 4.8%
2005       15:54.1              16:11.6                 1.8%
2004       15:27.4              15:34.5                 0.8%
2003       15:12.2              15:21.8                 1.1%  (overall avg 3.8%)


In conclusion, this year's times were a bit slower than last year, but fell in line with historical averages. I made a note last year that in the early 2000s there were some Class B girls from Leeds/Maddock absolutely shredding every race they ran, and could easily compete with the best in Class A, thus the lower percents.

So there's the Class A and B Girl's Analysis! I'll have the one for the Boys up sometime- these take awhile! Happy running everyone!